top of page

A Critical Analysis of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code through the Prism of Constitutional Morality

  • Writer: YourLawArticle
    YourLawArticle
  • 17 hours ago
  • 1 min read

Written by: Navroop Kaur, LL.B (2nd Year) , School Of Law, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India.

Abstract

To balance debtor protection and creditor interests while promoting economic growth, the bankruptcy and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) represents a significant legislative attempt to streamline and consolidate bankruptcy resolution in India. Beyond its procedural usefulness, though, the IBC presents serious concerns about its conformity to constitutional values, especially the idea of constitutional morality, which is a framework that requires all laws and state actions to uphold the spirit of the Constitution in order to guarantee justice, equality, and fairness. This essay discovers the conflict between protecting the rights of stakeholders, such as employees, minority creditors, and small investors, and advancing corporate resolution by critically analyzing the IBC through the prism of constitutional morality. The study assesses whether the Code, in reality, preserves constitutional ideals or puts economic feasibility ahead of social justice by inspecting significant court rulings, legislative purpose, and scholarly criticisms. The study stresses the necessity of a well-balanced insolvency framework that balances equality and efficiency, reflecting the moral and legal principles embodied in the Indian Constitution.

 

Keywords: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Constitutional Morality, Corporate Insolvency, Stakeholder Rights, Judicial Review, Economic Justice.

 


Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

Udyam No. : UDYAM-UP-50-0117422

  • LinkedIn
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

©2024 by YOUR LAW ARTICLE

Discover internships, contests, articles  and resources tailored for your legal journey. 

Please be aware that all the content in Your Law Articles is only for informational purposes. Nothing here provides any type of legal advice. No reader should act or refrain from acting based on any details provided on this website before consulting a professional. No communication with the website shall constitute an attorney/client relationship.

This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

bottom of page