top of page

Efficiency Versus Expediency: Investigating The Gaps In India’s Fast Track Corporate Insolvency Process

  • Writer: YourLawArticle
    YourLawArticle
  • Oct 27
  • 1 min read

Written by: Ishita Sareen , LL.B , School Of Law, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India.

&

Dr. Mohammad Rafiq Dar, Associate Professor At School Of Law, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India.

 

Abstract

This research paper investigates India's corporate insolvency speedy resolution process as part of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, highlighting the procedural timeframes along with its execution challenges in the speedy resolution process. This research analyzes the speediness of the process in terms of efficiency in corporate debt resolution and highlights the gaps concerning such as delays in the process, insufficient resources, delays in process, and disjointed stakeholders coordination. Some insolvency case studies are analysed to demonstrate the systemic inefficiencies and bottlenecks that create difficulties in timely resolution. The study concludes that while speedy processes are designed to be efficient and to promote creditor welfare, the gaps and inadequacies in implementing the speediness of the process, the deficient support structures, and the evolving complexities of corporate matters reflect on their significance and, as a result, call for policy changes and procedural enhancements.

 

Keywords: fast track insolvency, corporate debt resolution, IBC 2016, creditor welfare, efficiency of process, delay in processes, insolvency reforms

 


Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

Udyam No. : UDYAM-UP-50-0117422

  • LinkedIn
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

©2024 by YOUR LAW ARTICLE

Discover internships, contests, articles  and resources tailored for your legal journey. 

Please be aware that all the content in Your Law Articles is only for informational purposes. Nothing here provides any type of legal advice. No reader should act or refrain from acting based on any details provided on this website before consulting a professional. No communication with the website shall constitute an attorney/client relationship.

This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

bottom of page