Juveniles In Conflict With Law: Should They Be Tried As Adults In Heinous Crimes?

Written by: Aditya Prakash, 4^th Year Student , B.A.LL.B (Hons.,), School of Law, Lovely Professional University

Abstract

This paper critically examines the evolution of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and its departure from the reformative approach traditionally central to India’s juvenile justice system. Triggered by the Nirbhaya gang rape case, the 2015 amendments allow juveniles aged 16–18 to be tried as adults for heinous offences, raising concerns about their compatibility with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and constitutional principles. By analysing statutory provisions, judicial decisions, and socio-legal challenges, this study evaluates whether the current framework strikes a balance between deterrence, accountability, and the rehabilitative objectives of juvenile justice.

Keywords: Juvenile Justice, Juvenile Justice Act 2015, Nirbhaya Case, UNCRC, Child Rights

ARTICLE 16 ISSUE 6.pdf

Download PDF • 485KB

Volume 1 | Issue 6