Quotas And Equality: Unpacking India's Reservation Journey And The Rise Of Nari Shakti 2023

Written by: Adv Kavita N Solunke (BA, BSL, LLM, MBA, GDC&A, PG(ADR), STAR CCIO), Additional Government Pleader, Arbitrator, Mediator& Conciliator, High Court of Bombay & Notary, Govt of India

&

Adv Sarita N Solunke, Kedare (B. Com, LLM, GDC&A, DCA, CCIO, Arbitrator, Mediator, High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad, Maharashtra, State & Notary, Govt of India

Published on: 3^rd April 2026

Abstract

India's reservation policy represents a constitutional remedy to rectify historical caste-based inequalities rooted in the varna system's notions of ritual purity and pollution, systematically marginalising Shudras and Avarnas through economic, educational, and social exclusion. Emerging from Hunter-Phule's 1882 advocacy and formalised through the Poona Pact (1932), it gained permanence via Articles 15(4), 16(4), 330, and 332, targeting Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), Other Backward Classes (OBCs), and Economically Weaker Sections (EWS). This paper provides a comprehensive socio-legal analysis of its trajectory, judicial interpretations from M.R. Balaji’s 50% cap to Indra Sawhney’s creamy layer doctrine, and empirical outcomes, including poverty alleviation, alongside critiques like IIT dropout disparities and brain drain. Particular emphasis falls on the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (2023), reserving 33% parliamentary seats for women post-delimitation, building on Panchayati Raj successes where female leaders prioritised water infrastructure and reduced gender biases. Identifying challenges, a creamy layer exploitation, intersectional gaps, awareness deficits (52-72% in Delhi/UP), it proposes reforms: economic criteria, private sector quotas, OBC sub-quotas for women, ensuring substantive equality without reverse discrimination.

Keywords: reservation policy, caste system, affirmative action, social justice, constitutional law, equality, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, creamy layer, judicial review

first.pdf

Download PDF • 279KB

Volume2 | Issue 4