Corporate Culture As A Basis For Criminal Liability In India: Challenges, Comparative Insights, And Reform Proposals

Written by:  Vasant Subhash Sonawane, LL.M, Modern Law College, Pune

Published on: 13^th March 2026

Abstract

Corporate criminal liability in India has evolved from a narrow identification doctrine to a broader recognition of corporate personhood under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Companies Act, 2013. However, Indian law does not yet treat “corporate culture” defined as the attitudes, policies, rules, practices, or systemic failures within an organisation that authorise, encourage, tolerate, or lead to criminal conduct — as an independent basis for liability. This paper critically examines the doctrinal gaps, contrasts India’s approach with Australia’s explicit “corporate culture” model (Criminal Code Act 1995, s 12.3), the UK’s management-failure test, and US sentencing guidelines, and analyses landmark Indian cases such as Iridium India Telecom Ltd v Motorola Inc (2011) and Standard Chartered Bank v Directorate of Enforcement (2005). Through doctrinal, comparative, and case-study methods, it demonstrates that the current identification/vicarious framework fails to capture diffused responsibility in modern corporations. The paper proposes statutory amendments to incorporate an organisational-liability model focused on corporate culture, supported by due-diligence defences and enhanced sentencing tools. Such reform would promote ethical governance, deter systemic wrongdoing, and align India with international best practices while preserving legitimate business activity.

Keywords: Corporate criminal liability, corporate culture, organisational liability, identification doctrine, white-collar crime, corporate governance, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Companies Act 2013, corporate fraud, compliance culture, comparative criminal law, Australia Criminal Code Act 1995, corporate accountability

article 8.pdf

Download PDF • 255KB

Volume 2 | Issue 3